Williams v. Garnett et al
| Marcus Williams |
| Jason Garnett, Sullivan, Harrington, Debbie Isaacs, Wexford Services, Inc., Unknown Party and Dr. McBride |
| 3:2017cv00501 |
| May 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Jefferson |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED AGAINST Plaintiff and IN FAVOR OF Defendant. Plaintiff shall recover nothing, and the action is DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs. This dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiffs three allotted strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/11/2017. (tkm)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: COUNTS 1 and 2 are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants GARNETT, SULLIVAN, HARRINGTON, ISAACS, WEXFORD SERVICES, INC., UKNOWN PARTY DENTIST, and McBRIDE are DISMIS SED from this action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint within 35 days of the entry of this order (on or before August 2, 2017). 3 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense filed by Marcus Williams is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 6/28/2017. (jaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
