Croom v. Lashbrook et al
| Christopher Croom |
| 3:2017cv00612 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| David R. Herndon |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER finding as moot 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 74 Motion to Supplement; and adopting 75 Report and Recommendations. See Order for details. The Court ADOP TS the Report, GRANTS the motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion, dismisses without prejudice plaintiff's cause of action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Further, the Court denies as moot the motion to dismiss. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment reflecting the same. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/10/2018. (klh)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 11/6/2017. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. (Doc.1). Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is also DENIED. (Doc. 5). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his first amended complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support the personal involvement of any defendant in his conditions of confinement claims and any related claims, within 30 days of the entry of th is Order. Failure to file an amended complaint shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Such dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiffs three allotted strikes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). No service shall be ord ered on any Defendant until after the Court completes its § 1915A review of the First Amended Complaint. In order to assist Plaintiff in preparing his amended complaint, the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 7/7/2017. (tkm)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Lashbrook and John Doe 1 are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counts 2-11, which are unrelated to Count 1, are severed into 3 separate cases. The firs t case shall contain Counts 2-7 and shall be against Tripp, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3. The second case shall contain Counts 8-10 against John Doe 4 and Rodely. The third case shall contain Count 11. Defendants Tripp, Rodely, and John Does 2-4 shall b e DISMISSED from this case without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the only claims remaining in this action is Count 1. John Doe (2 - 3rd Shift Sgt.), John Doe (3 - Nurse or Medical Provider), Jacqueline Lashbrook (Warden), Counselor Rodely, Nurse Tripp, John Doe (4 - C/O working in Law Library) and John Doe (1 - Segregation Major) terminated. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/14/2017. (jaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Croom v. Lashbrook et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Croom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
