Townes v. David et al
Henry L. Townes |
Alfonso David, Tammie Pittayathikhan, Karen Smoot and Jeffery Dennison |
3:2017cv00651 |
June 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Johnson |
Michael J. Reagan |
Stephen C. Williams |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 ORDER ADOPTING 76 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Motion for Sanctions filed by Defendant Jeffery Dennison (Doc. 72) is GRANTED, and the claims against Defendant Jeffery Dennison are DISMISSED with prejudice. This case is CLOSED, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/2/2019. (mlp) |
Filing 66 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ADOPTS in its entirety Magistrate Judge Williams's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 65 ) and GRANTS the motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants David and Pittayathikhan (Do c. 41 ) and Defendants Smoot and Swalls (Doc. 44 ). All claims as to those Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. As Defendant Dennison did not move for summary judgment, the claims against him remain pending. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 8/8/2018. (rah) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/12/2017. (jaj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.