Woodall et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
| Malcolm Woodall and Julwel Kenney |
| Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare AG and Bayer AG |
| 3:2017cv00754 |
| July 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| St. Clair |
| David R. Herndon |
| Personal Injury: Health Care |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Remand to State Court; granting in part 14 Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of personal jurisdiction; denying 16 Motion to Dismiss Case for insufficient service of process and denying 18 Motion to Stay. Based on the foregoing, plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 11) is DENIED. Janssen defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED IN PART; non-Illinois plaintiff Julwel Kenney's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal j urisdiction, and the Court RETAINS jurisdiction over defendants regarding Illinois plaintiff Woodall's claims. Bayer defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service (Doc. 16) is DENIED, and Joinder to Janssen defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Further, defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. 18) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 9/22/2017. (klh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
