Augusta v. Vandalia Correctional Center
| Quennel T. Augusta |
| Vandalia Correctional Center |
| 3:2017cv00919 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Fayette |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This includes COUNTS 1, 2, 3, and 4 against Defendants STEPHANIE WAGGONER, JOHN DOE, JOHN BALDWIN, and BRUCE RAUNER.Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal counts as one of his three allotted strikes under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 7/24/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 12) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS ORDERED that COUNTS 1, 2, and 4 are DISMISSED without prejudice and COUNT 3 is DISMI SSED with prejudice, all for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants EMPLOYEES OF V.C.C. and EMPLOYEES OF I.D.O.C. are DISMISSED with prejudice because they are not suable defendants, but rather nebulo us designations for large groups of unknown defendants.IT IS ORDERED that Defendants WAGGONER, BALDWIN, and RAUNER are DISMISSED without prejudice because the First Amended Complaint states no claim for relief against them. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tha t Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a Second Amended Complaint in this case on or before February 28, 2018. Should Plaintiff fail to file his Second Amended Complaint within the allotted time, dismissal of this action will become with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 2/28/2018). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/31/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant action addresses Plaintiff's knee injury claims. IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant VANDALIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER is DISMISSED with prejudice from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this case on or before November 2, 2017. Should Plaintiff fail to file his First Amended Complaint within the allotted time, dismissal of this action will become with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 11/1/2017). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/4/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Augusta v. Vandalia Correctional Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quennel T. Augusta | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vandalia Correctional Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
