Hughes v. Raymon et al
| Doris Hughes |
| Jose Raymon, Ryan Hunley, Jeffery Whiting, Touchette Regional Hospital and Barnes-Jewish Hospital |
| 3:2017cv00947 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| St. Clair |
| Reona J. Daly |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and REINSTATING and GRANTING 5 Motion for Service of Process at the Government's Expense. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to complete a summons and form USM-285 for service of process on Defendant Stryker Corporation. The Clerk SHALL deliver the completed summons, USM-285 form, a copy of the second amended complaint, and a copy of this Order to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal SHALL serve Stryker Corporation pursuant to Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/29/2018. (bak)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER, DENYING 3 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Doris Hughes. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/29/2017. (bak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
