Hood, Sr. v. Lamb et al
| Curtis R Hood, Sr. |
| Nicholas R. Lamb, Lt. Bach, Lt. Ochs, C/O Lence and C/O Shaner |
| 3:2017cv00955 |
| September 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lawrence |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER GRANTING 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Shaner is DISMISSED with prejudice and judgment will be entered in Shaner's favor. There being no claims or Defendants remaining in this action, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close this case on the Courts docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 10/6/20. (klh2)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 39 ) over Plaintiff's objection (Doc. 41 ). Summary judgment shall be GRA NTED in favor of Defendants Bach and Ochs. At the conclusion of the case, judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants Bach and Ochs with prejudice and against Plaintiff. The case shall proceed only as to Defendant Shaner. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 3/15/2019. (rah)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/26/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
