Battle v. Smoot et al
| Jovan Miguel Battle |
| K. Smoot, L. LeCrone, K. Hamm Ersley, B. Campbell, L. Walker, Illinois Department of Corrections, State of Illinois, John/Jane Doe, P. Stone and B. Allard |
| 3:2017cv01165 |
| October 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Johnson |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. This dismissal shall not count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/12/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Denying 27 MOTION for Reconsideration: The Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $400.00 filing fee in this case on or before July 5, 2018. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). (Action due by 7/5/2018.). Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/4/2018. (dsw)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. This dismissal shall not count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/18/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
