Thornton v. Lashbrook et al
Plaintiff: Charles E. Thornton
Defendant: Jacqueline Lashbrook, New and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2017cv01296
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 237 ORDER: Plaintiff Charles E. Thornton's Objection (Doc. 236 ) to Defendants' Bill of Costs (Doc. 234 ) is OVERRULED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay Defendants' costs in the amount of $966.80. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 9/7/2022. (anb2)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 232 ORDER GRANTING 204 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Charles E. Thornton's claims against Defendants Cynthia Gimber, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Misty New, Regina Price, and Pamela Scott are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 8/17/2021. (anb2)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER: The 171 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint and the 187 Motion Directing the Court to File Supplemental Complaint are DENIED. The 183 Motion for Reconsideration is also DENIED. The 182 Motion for Status is GRANTED. Currently, discovery is still being conducted and must be completed by October 9, 2020. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Thornton a copy of the docket sheet in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/4/2020. (jrj)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER. The following motions filed by Thornton are DENIED: 150 Motion to Take Depositions, 162 Motion to Take Non-Stenographic Depositions, 163 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel, 167 Motion to Compel Discovery, 170 Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories, 172 Motion to Strike, 173 Second Motion to Strike, and 175 Motion for a Copy of the Status of the Case. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Thornton a copy of the docket sheet. The 168 Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion to Take Non-Stenographic Deposition is GRANTED. The 177 Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendant Scott is GRANTED and the response deemed timely file. The 171 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint filed by Thornton remains pending, and Defendants are DIRECTED to file a response to the motion by July 23, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/9/2020. (jrj)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 72 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Motion is denied as to Cynthia Gimber and she remains a Defendant to Count 1. It is granted as to Regina Price and she is DISMISSED without prejudice as a Defendant to Count 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/9/2019. (anb2)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER MOOTING 36 Motion for Leave to File; GRANTING IN PART 40 Motion for Leave to File; DENYING 41 Motion ; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 43 Motion to Clarify. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 11/29/2018. (sgp)
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. IT IS ORDERED that as to COUNT 1, Plaintiff has neither sought nor been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, and the Court will not automatically appoint the Unit ed States Marshal to effect service of process upon Defendants MR./MS. NEW, MS. PRICE, and JOHN DOE (once identified). If Plaintiff desires to request the appointment of the United States Marshal to serve process on these defendants, Plaintiff shal l file a Motion for Service of Process at Government Expense, within 28 days of the date of entry of this order (on or before April 4, 2018). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank Motion and a copy of the Court's Pro Se Litigant Guide, containing instructions for filing this type of motion. (Action due by 4/4/2018). Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/7/2018. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornton v. Lashbrook et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles E. Thornton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacqueline Lashbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?