Wyma v. State of Illinois et al
Christopher Wyma |
Warden |
3:2018cv00092 |
January 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Randolph |
David R. Herndon |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER GRANTING 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mohammed Siddiqui, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Dr. Mohammed Siddiqui and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and against Plaintiff Christopher Wyma. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 6/1/2021. (nmf) |
Filing 75 ORDER GRANTING 73 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Christopher Wyma. The Order and Judgment entered on October 30, 2020 (Docs. 71 and 72) are VACATED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff copies of docket entries 68, 69, and 70, includi ng all attachments. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment by May 21, 2021. Defendants may reply to Plaintiff's response in accordance with Local Rules. In light of this Order, Plaintiff's motion for status (Doc. 74) is FOUND AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 4/21/2021. (nmf) |
Filing 71 ORDER GRANTING 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mohammed Siddiqui, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Dr. Mohammed Siddiqui and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and against Plaintiff Christopher Wyma. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 10/30/2020. (nmf) |
Filing 53 ORDER DENYING 34 Motion for Summary Judgment for Plaintiff's Failure to Exhaust His Administrative Remedies filed by Defendants Wexford Health Sources, Inc., and Dr. Mohammed Siddiqui. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to correct the names on the docket as reflected in Footnote 1. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/11/2019. (mlp) |
Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 8/30/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) and COUNTS 1 and 2 are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that WARDEN and JANE/JOHN DOE are dismissed witho ut prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file a Third Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support an Eighth Amendment medical needs claim, within 28 days of the entry of this order (on or before June 14, 2018). Should Plaintiff fail to file his Third Amended Complaint within the allotted time or consistent with the instructions set forth in this Order, the entire case shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and/or for failure to prosecute his claims. (Amended Pleadings due by 6/14/2018). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 5/17/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) and COUNT 1 are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support an Eighth Amendment medical needs claim, within 28 days of the entry of this order (on or before May 8, 2018). Should Plaintiff fail to file his Second Amended Co mplaint within the allotted time or consistent with the instructions set forth in this Order, the entire case shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and/or for failure to prosecute his claims. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/8/2018). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 4/10/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNT 1, which is unrelated to the other claim in this action, is SEVERED into a new case against the ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and the STATE OF ILLINOIS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support a cognizable § 1983 claim, within 28 days of the entry of this Order (on or before February 26, 2018). Should Plaintiff fail to file his F irst Amended Complaint within the allotted time or consistent with the instructions set forth in this Order, the entire case shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure to complywith a court order and/or for failure to prosecute his claims. (Amended Pleadings due by 2/26/2018). Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 1/22/2018. (tjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wyma v. State of Illinois et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christopher Wyma | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Warden | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.