Kitterman v. Norton et al
| Shane Allen Kitterman |
| William Bill Norton and Jeffrey Dennison |
| 3:2018cv00190 |
| February 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Johnson |
| David R. Herndon |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal counts as one of his three allotted strikes under the provisions of 28 U.S.C . § 1915(g). Further, because two of Plaintiff's other lawsuits4 have also been dismissed pursuant to § 1915A for being frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the dismissal of this case gives Plaintiff his third strike. Accordingly, if Plaintiff seeks to file any future civil action while he is a prisoner, he will no longer be eligible to pay a filing fee in installments using the in forma pauperis provisions of § 191 5(a) and (b), unless he can establish that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Plaintiff cannot make the necessary showing of imminent physical danger, he shall be required to prepay the full filing fee for any future lawsuit he may file while incarcerated, or face dismissal of the suit. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 3/9/2018. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
