Harris v. Baldwin et al
| Larry G. Harris |
| J. Baldwin, Deputy Director Atchins, Jeff Dennison, Warden Campbell, Warden Walker, Major Grisham and Unknown Party |
| 3:2018cv00711 |
| March 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Johnson |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Daly's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 81 ) in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Baldwin, Campbell, Walker, G rissom, Hille, Rehfuss, Farner, and Campanella are DISMISSED without prejudice, as are Counts 1 and 2 as to Dennison. The sole remaining claim is Count 4 against Dennison. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 5/15/2020. (bps)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING 57 MOTION to Substitute Party filed by Larry G. Harris. Order for Service of Process upon Jeanne Campanella. The Clerk is DIRECTED to SUBSTITUTE Defendant Jeanne Campanella in place of Robert Mueller. Defendant Mueller shall be te rminated from the case. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendant Campanella: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail these forms, a copy of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 11), a copy of the Memorandum and Order at Doc. 18, and this Order to Defendant Campanella's place of employment as identified by Plaintiff. If Defendant fails to sign and return the Waiver of Service o f Summons (Form 6) to the Clerk within 30 days from the date the forms were sent, the Clerk shall take appropriate steps to effect formal service on that Defendant, and the Court will require Defendant to pay the full costs of formal service, to the extent authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 5/16/2019. (ely)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/19/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed or monetary sanctions imposed due to the failure to disclose his prior litigation history. Plaintiff shall show case no later than October 30, 2018. Failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41(b). (Action due by 10/30/2018). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/9/2018. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counts 1-2, and 4-5 are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Counts 3, 6, and 7 are DISMISSED with prejudice as legally frivolous. Plaintiff's Motion for a TRO is DENIED. (Doc. 3). Plaintiff 9;s Motion to Name Defendants is GRANTED in part and otherwise DENIED as moot. (Doc. 5). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to change Defendant Major Grisham to Terry Grissom.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plainti ff shall file his First Amended Complaint, stating any facts which may exist to support his claims dismissed without prejudice (on or before June 22, 2018). (Amended Pleadings due by 6/22/2018). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/25/2018. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
