Johnson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
| James Johnson |
| Guard Dulainey, Jacqueline Lashbrook, John Doe, Sergeant Jones, Nurse Engglage, Wexford Health Services Inc, John Baldwin, Guard Dudinski, Guard Wesley N. Engglage, Registered Nurse Hawkins, Guard McCaleb, Sergeant Lindenberg, Guard Griffin, Lieutenant Witthuft, Medical Director Siddiqui, Major Chad Hasselmeyer, John Carter, Illinois Department of Corrections, John Doe #1, Warden Randy Pfister, Guard Kyle Brumleve and John Doe #2 |
| 3:2018cv01374 |
| July 11, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Letter from USDC/SDIL to Plaintiff informing him of transfer and new case number. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge, #2 Notice of Court's Change of Address) (jaj)
|
|
Filing 12
Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:17-cv-06825. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 11
TRANSFERRED to the USDC Southern District of Illinois the electronic record. (sxb, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's initial review under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against former Stateville Correctional Center Warden Pfister. The remainder of Plaintiff's claims involve allegations of mistreatment at Menard Correctional Center. Menard Correctional Center is in Randolph County, Illinois, which lies in the Southern District of Illinois. See 28 U.S.C. 93(c). Thus, the Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois for any further proceedings, including resolution of filing-fee payment obligations associated with Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 6/27/2018. Mailed notice. (sxb, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 9
LETTER from James Johnson. (Envelope postmarked 6/11/18) (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER from James Johnson dated 4/6/2018. (Envelope postmarked 4/9/2018; institution mail room) (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 7
LETTER from James Johnson dated 4/22/2018. (Envelope postmarked 4/23/18; institution mail room) (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION by Plaintiff James Johnson for leave to file an amended complaint (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION by Plaintiff James Johnson for appointment of counsel (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 4
DECLARATION of James Johnson (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION by Plaintiff James Johnson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibit) (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by James Johnson (mma, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 7/11/2018.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
