Parry v. Muller
Roy Parry |
B. Muller |
3:2018cv01394 |
July 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Tazewell |
J Phil Gilbert |
Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/23/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This dismissal shall not count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/23/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 10 Consent Form - IFP Proceedings by Roy Parry. (tjk) |
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Roy Parry. (jaj) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Parry, granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Roy Parry. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/7/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Roy Parry. (tkm) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (see Doc. 2), but has failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the PLRA to determine whether the inmate is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), the Court must review the prisoner trust fund account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court with the attached certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at the facility and a copy of his/her trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period 1/1/2018 to 7/16/2018 no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at FCI-Pekin. (Trust Fund Statement due on or before 9/10/2018). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/25/2018. (jaj) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Roy Parry. (tkm) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Roy Parry. (tkm) |
Filing 3 Letter from USDC/SDIL to Plaintiff informing him of case number. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (jaj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roy Parry. (jaj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B. Muller filed by Roy Parry.(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parry v. Muller | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: B. Muller | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roy Parry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.