Gudger v. Werlich
Petitioner: William Gudger
Respondent: T. G. Werlich
Case Number: 3:2018cv01453
Filed: July 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Bond
Presiding Judge: Michael J Reagan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2018 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 34625086156. (dmw2)
July 30, 2018 Filing 2 Letter from USDC/SDIL to Petitioner informing him of case number and filing fee requirements. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge, #2 Motion to Proceed IFP) (jaj)
July 30, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Gudger. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support)(jaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gudger v. Werlich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Gudger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: T. G. Werlich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?