Johnson v. Thompson et al
Plaintiff: Ivan Johnson
Defendant: Scott Thompson, Assistant Warden Love, Lt. Wall and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2018cv01476
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Perry
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Referring Judge: Donald G Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Ann Ditzler on behalf of Assistant Warden Love, Scott Thompson, Lt. Wall (Ditzler, Megan)
September 13, 2018 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Assistant Warden Love waiver sent on 8/30/2018, answer due 10/29/2018. (tjk)
September 13, 2018 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Scott Thompson waiver sent on 8/30/2018, answer due 10/29/2018. (tjk)
September 13, 2018 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Lt. Wall waiver sent on 8/30/2018, answer due 10/29/2018. (tjk)
September 10, 2018 Filing 8 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 40.56 received, receipt number 34625086767 (cds)
August 30, 2018 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Thompson, Wall, and Love on 8/30/2018. Waiver of Service due by 10/1/2018. (tjk)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson, denying #3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Ivan Johnson. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/30/2018. (tjk)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #2 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $40.56. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid.In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Pinckneyville Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/14/2018. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 Letter from USDC/SDIL to Plaintiff informing him of case number. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (jaj)
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Ivan Johnson. (jaj)
August 8, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ivan Johnson. (jaj)
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ivan Johnson.(jaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Thompson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Thompson
Represented By: Megan Ann Ditzler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assistant Warden Love
Represented By: Megan Ann Ditzler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Wall
Represented By: Megan Ann Ditzler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ivan Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?