Cowboy Supermarket et al v. Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
Cowboy Supermarket and Mohammed Almuttan |
Sonny Perdue and Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture |
3:2018cv01480 |
August 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Stephen C Williams |
Staci M Yandle |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cowboy Supermarket, Mohammed Almuttan. Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture served on 8/29/2018, answer due 9/19/2018. (Paulson, Alvin) |
Filing 10 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #9 Return of Service Executed filed by Cowboy Supermarket, Mohammed Almuttan. Incorrect event selected. For this document, the correct event is "Summons Returned Executed" located under Civil >> Initial Pleadings and Service >> Service of Process. Document should be re-filed accordingly in order to properly trigger the answer due deadline. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 9 STRICKEN - RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED by Mohammed Almuttan, Cowboy Supermarket on 08/29/2018. (Paulson, Alvin) Modified on 9/13/2018 (kek). |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and original mailed to Attorney Paulson. (kek) |
Filing 7 Summons Requested. (Paulson, Alvin) |
Filing 6 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #5 Summons Requested. Summons attached is blank. The filer should select the CM/ECF event "Summons Requested" and attach one completed summons for each defendant in compliance with FRCP 4. (See Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements for an Attorney Filer located on this Court's website). In addition, fillable form documents should be converted to non-fillable PDFs prior to filing on CM/ECF. Document should be re-filed accordingly. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 5 STRICKEN - Summons Requested. (Paulson, Alvin) Modified on 8/23/2018 (kek). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Alvin C. Paulson on behalf of Mohammed Almuttan, Cowboy Supermarket (Paulson, Alvin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ACTION re #1 Complaint filed by Cowboy Supermarket, Mohammed Almuttan. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Paulson does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (kdb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Staci M. Yandle and Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-1480-SMY-SCW. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (kdb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sonny Perdue ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3640969.), filed by Cowboy Supermarket, Mohammed Almuttan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Paulson, Alvin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.