Webb v. Reynolds et al
| Darron Antwone Webb |
| L. Reynolds, Warden Werlich, D. Quercia, Liuetenant Phillips, Lt. Smith, Morris, A W Zantout and Lieutenant Phillips |
| 3:2018cv01498 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Bond |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/17/2018. (tjk) |
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal shall count as one of his allotted strikes under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/17/2018. (tjk)
|
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Service of Summons/Complaint by U.S. Marshal, Pursuant to 28 USC 1915 (a)(1)(d) by Darron Antwone Webb. (tkm) |
| Filing 10 Consent Form - IFP Proceedings by Darron Antwone Webb (tkm) |
| Filing 9 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 11.19 received, receipt number 34625086809. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Webb, granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darron Antwone Webb. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/29/2018. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (tkm) |
| Filing 6 MOTION Addendum to Sought and/or Requested Relief by Darron Antwone Webb. (tkm) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (tkm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (see Doc. 2), but has failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the PLRA to determine whether the inmate is entitled to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), the Court must review the prisoner trust fund account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court with the attached certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at the facility and a copy of his/her trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period 2/1/2018 TO 8/15/2018 no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at FCI-Greenville. (Trust Fund Statement due on or before 10/1/2018). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/16/2018. (jaj)
|
| Filing 3 Letter from USDC/SDIL to Plaintiff informing him of case number. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (jaj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darron Antwone Webb. (jaj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Darron Antwone Webb. (Attachments: #1 Second Complaint)(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
