McCullough v. Brown et al
| Brandy McCullough |
| Glennon Brown and Don Heil Oil Company |
| 3:2018cv01556 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte for the purpose of case management. This action was previously removed to this Court from the Circuit Court of Madison County, Illinois under case number 18-cv-1178-SMY-RJD and remanded to state court by District Judge Staci Yandle. Defendants removed this action a second time on August 27, 2018, under the above-captioned case number. Because Judge Yandle previously presided over this matter, the undersigned ORDERS this case to be REASSIGNED to Judge Yandle. All future documents filed in this matter shall bear the case number 18-cv-1556-SMY-RJD. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/7/2018. (drb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENT TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1446, this case was removed from state court to this U.S. District Court. Section 1446(a) delineates the procedure for removing a case from state court to federal court and requires, inter alia, that the removing defendant furnish a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant. Because a jury may be demanded in a state court pleading that is not served upon the defendant(s) (e.g., an answer or a separately-filed jury demand), and this Courts civil cover sheet instructs attorneys to check the Jury Demand box only if a jury was requested in the complaint, the Court hereby DIRECTS the removing defendant(s) to file as a Supplement to Notice of Removal a copy of any state court answer or other pleading/paper which contains a jury demand OR a one-line statement that no jury was demanded by any party prior to removal. If a jury demand appears in the federal case record, no Supplement to Notice of Removal need be filed. In addition, attorneys are reminded that they must file a formal entry of appearance in this case. The removing defendant(s) shall comply with this directive within 14 days from the date of this Order. Supplement to Notice of Removal due by 9/11/2018. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/28/2018. (cjo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel and Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-1556-NJR-RJD. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (cjo) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Don Heil Oil Company. (Boggs, Beth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Beth C. Boggs on behalf of All Defendants (Boggs, Beth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County, IL, case number 2018L000562 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3655449), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Answers to Defendants' Interrogatories, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Complaint, #4 Original FIling Form)(Boggs, Beth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
