Hamilton v. USA
| Corrine Hamilton |
| James McCormick and USA |
| 3:2018cv02017 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE by USA Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Strike #20 Response in Opposition to Motion, Affidavit of Joe Kozuszek by USA. (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #19 MOTION for Reconsideration of Court Order Granting Substitution (Doc. 11) filed by USA. (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re #18 MOTION for Order toStay Discovery filed by All Plaintiffs. (Wendler, Brian) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by Corrine Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Wendler, Brian) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Reconsideration of Court Order Granting Substitution (Doc. 11) by Corrine Hamilton. (Wendler, Brian) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Order toStay Discovery by USA. (Garrison, Suzanne) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER: The Joint Report of Parties is approved and entered. Discovery to be completed by 8/8/2019. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 8/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 11/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Joint Report of Parties)(jlm)
|
| Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly: Scheduling and Discovery Conference held on 11/20/2018. Attorney Brian Wendler for Plaintiff and Attorney Suzanne Garrison for Defendant. Parties are to submit a Joint Report within 5 days to Judge Daly's proposed documents e-mail account. (jlm)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. Wendler on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wendler, Brian) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #13 Complaint filed by Corrine Hamilton. Incorrect event selected. Filer should file document using the event "Notice of Appearance". Pleading must be re filed. (cds)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 13 STRICKEN - COMPLAINT Supplement, Entry of Appearance against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs.(Wendler, Brian) Modified on 11/6/2018 (cds). |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment by USA. Responses due by 12/6/2018 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stacey J. Vetter)(Garrison, Suzanne) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION to Substitute Party filed by James McCormick. United States of America represented by Suzanne Garrison is substituted as Defendant for James McCormick. Defendant James McCormick is terminated as a Defendant in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 11/1/2018. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY: Disputes which require a ruling on a motion made under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be handled in the following manner. The party seeking a discovery order shall request a prompt telephone conference with Judge Daly and opposing counsel by alerting the law clerk assigned to the case and providing the law clerk with appropriate material, such as: (1) a list or summary of the items in dispute, (2) copies of written requests/objections/privilege logs in dispute, and (3) an estimate of the amount of time needed to present argument to the Court. Law clerks prefer to receive these materials through Judge Daly's email depository for proposed documents. Prior to seeking a telephone conference with Judge Daly, the parties must meet and confer in an attempt to resolve the dispute informally. Argument on motions to compel discovery or for discovery sanctions shall be presented orally at the telephone conference. Written motions or legal memoranda will not be accepted unless specifically requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 10/31/2018. (jlm)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Scheduling and Discovery Conference: Scheduling and Discovery Conference set for 11/20/2018 at 9:30 AM via telephone before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. To join the conference call, the parties should call Judge Daly's conference line at 618-439-7731. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in the conference call. (jlm) |
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT by James McCormick. Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal . (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Substitute Party by James McCormick. (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by James McCormick. . (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 5 CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference is set for 12/4/2019 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert. Bench Trial is set for 12/16/2019 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert.(tag) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENT TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1446, this case was removed from state court to this U.S. District Court. Section 1446(a) delineates the procedure for removing a case from state court to federal court and requires, inter alia, that the removing defendant furnish a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant. Because a jury may be demanded in a state court pleading that is not served upon the defendant(s) (e.g., an answer or a separately-filed jury demand), and this Courts civil cover sheet instructs attorneys to check the Jury Demand box only if a jury was requested in the complaint, the Court hereby DIRECTS the removing defendant(s) to file as a Supplement to Notice of Removal a copy of any state court answer or other pleading/paper which contains a jury demand OR a one-line statement that no jury was demanded by any party prior to removal. If a jury demand appears in the federal case record, no Supplement to Notice of Removal need be filed. In addition, attorneys are reminded that they must file a formal entry of appearance in this case. The removing defendant(s) shall comply with this directive within 14 days from the date of this Order. Supplement to Notice of Removal due by 11/9/2018(cds)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-cv-2017-JPG-RJD. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (cds) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne M. Garrison on behalf of James McCormick (Garrison, Suzanne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court, St. Clair County, Illinois, case number 18-L-609, filed by James McCormick. (Attachments: #1 State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garrison, Suzanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
