Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Stacey Lynn Boyd
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Case Number: 3:2018cv02096
Filed: November 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Clifford J Proud
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2019 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/20/2018, answer due 2/19/2019. (Sutterfield, David)
December 20, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE OF REFERRAL: Upon consent of parties case transferred to Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud for final disposition. Judge J. Phil Gilbert no longer assigned to the case. (cjo)
December 20, 2018 Filing 9 FINAL CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Sutterfield, David) Modified on 12/20/2018 (cjo).
December 19, 2018 Filing 8 CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garrison, Suzanne) Unsealed on 12/20/2018 (cjo).
December 19, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne M. Garrison on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Garrison, Suzanne)
November 29, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (cjo)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stacey Lynn Boyd. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/27/2018. (jdh)
November 21, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-2096-JPG-CJP. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (cjo)
November 20, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Sutterfield on behalf of Stacey Lynn Boyd (Sutterfield, David)
November 20, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stacey Lynn Boyd. (Sutterfield, David)
November 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interest, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285 forms)(Sutterfield, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Lynn Boyd
Represented By: David W. Sutterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Suzanne M. Garrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSAOGC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?