Gutierrez v. Cotton et al
| Armando Gutierrez |
| John Doe and Whik Cotton |
| 3:2018cv02160 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Case transferred from Illinois Southern has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS as case 4:18-cv-1440, filed 12/10/2018.. (cds) |
| Filing 6 Case electronically transferred to Central District of Illinois.. (tjk) |
Filing 5
Memorandum and Order Severing Case and Transferring Case to Central District of Illinois. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 12/7/2018. (tjk)
|
| Filing 4 SECOND MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Armando Gutierrez. (tjk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Armando Gutierrez. (tjk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF SEVERED CASE OPENING: On 12/7/2018, this case was severed from Gutierrez v. Baldwin, et al, SDIL Case No. 18-cv-1478-SMY-RJD. Your case name and number is Gutierrez v. Cotton, et al, SDIL Case No. 18-cv-2160-SMY. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Whik Cotton, John Doe, filed by Armando Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(tjk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
