Jones v. Doe et al
Malik Jones |
John Doe, Jacqueline Lashbrook and Nurse Jane Doe |
3:2018cv02173 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Staci M Yandle |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 29.54 received, receipt number 34625089927 (cds) |
Filing fee: $ 7.65, receipt number 34625089931 (cds) |
|
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (jsm2) |
|
|
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:18-cv-07887. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 5 TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Division the electronic record. (ph, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 12/14/2018.] |
|
Filing 3 MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or cost by Plaintiff Malik Jones (Attachment). (yap, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 12/14/2018.] |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (yap, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 12/14/2018.] |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Malik Jones. (yap, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 12/14/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.