Carder v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Paul R. Carder |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2018cv02184 |
| December 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Clifford J Proud |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting #3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Paul R. Carder. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/21/2018. (jdh)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Severs, Traci) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud assigned. All future documents must bear case number 18-2184-JPG-CJP. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (dmw2) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul R. Carder. (Severs, Traci) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Traci L. Severs on behalf of Paul R. Carder (Severs, Traci) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Paul R. Carder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Nancy Berryhill)(Severs, Traci) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
