Mister v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
| Sharvelt Mister |
| Susan Griffin, Illinois Department of Corrections, Dr. Nawoor, Mrs. Hackney, Kathy Gavin, Dr. Barra, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Santos, Dr. Obadina, Dr. Kayira, Dr. Mattricks, Dr. Murphy, Dr. Garcia and Lisa Krebs |
| 3:2019cv00149 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Sharvelt Mister. (jsm2) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Sharvelt Mister.(jsm2) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sharvelt Mister. (Document filed per Order at Doc. 8). (jsm2) |
Filing 9
Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Leave to Amend/Add to Complaint. The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-file the original #1 Complaint and proposed Addition to Complaint together as the "First Amended Complaint" in CM/ECF. The First Amended Complaint supersedes and replaces the original Complaint and renders it VOID. See Flannery v. Recording Indus. Ass'n of Am., 354 F.3d 632, 638 n. 1 (7th Cir. 2004). The First Amended Complaint is subject to preliminary review under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Plaintiff will be provided with a copy of the screening order once this review is complete. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 3/15/2019. (jsy)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 8
Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Amend and Correct #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the Amended Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis in CM/ECF. The Order Granting IFP at Doc. 5 stands. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 3/15/2019. (jsy)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Amend/Add to Complaint by Sharvelt Mister. (Proposed Addition to Complaint received and under review). (jsm2) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend and Correct #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sharvelt Mister. (Attachments: #1 Amended Motion to Proceed IFP, #2 Envelope).(jsm2) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. 3 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $49.09. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid. In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Taylorville Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 2/27/2019. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER : The Court has received your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. A copy of the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form is attached to this Order. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 2/27/2019. (tjk)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sharvelt Mister. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Complaint. Your case number is 19-149-SMY. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $400.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 2/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge)(jaj)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Sharvelt Mister.(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
