Baker v. People of the State of Illinois et al
Plaintiff: Donnie Baker
Defendant: Thomas A. Spiller, People of State of Illinois, John Doe, Steven Bertra, Warden, Leslie McCarty and Sarah Johnson
Case Number: 3:2019cv00393
Filed: April 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Filing 20 USCA Case Number 19-2285 for #16 Notice of Appeal filed by Donnie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Case Opening, #2 Circuit Rule 3(b) Notice)(kek)
July 8, 2019 Filing 19 Rule 10 Letter. (kls3)
July 8, 2019 Filing 18 Transmission of Short Record to USCA-7 re #16 Notice of Appeal (kls3)
July 8, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE of Change of Address by Donnie Baker. See document #16 . (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
July 8, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #10 Order Dismissing case as Frivolous, #11 Clerk's Judgment by Donnie Baker. (jaj)
July 8, 2019 Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Docs. 10 and 11. Mail sent to Donnie Baker. (amv)
June 26, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address by Donnie Baker. (jaj)
June 14, 2019 Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable (Docs. 10 & 11). Mail sent to Donnie Baker. (jsm2)
June 7, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Donnie Baker. (jaj)
June 4, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/4/2019. (anp)
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE as factually frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/4/2019. (anp)
May 15, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Donnie Baker.(jaj)
May 6, 2019 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT by Donnie Baker. Supplement to #1 Complaint. (jaj)
May 6, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Donnie Baker. (jaj)
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER : The Court has received your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/25/2019. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
April 18, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Donnie Baker. Responses due by 5/23/2019 (jaj)
April 17, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donnie Baker. (jaj)
April 17, 2019 Filing 3 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Complaint. Your case number is 19-393-NJR. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $400.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge)(jaj)
April 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Donnie Baker.(jaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. People of the State of Illinois et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas A. Spiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: People of State of Illinois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Bertra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leslie McCarty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sarah Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donnie Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?