Shropshire v. Sensient Technologies, Inc. et al
Demarcus Schropshire and Demarcus Shropshire |
Sensient Technologies, Inc. and Sensient Colors LLC |
3:2019cv00480 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Mark A Beatty |
Staci M Yandle |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MOTION to Join Defendant Sensient Colors LLCs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint by Sensient Technologies, Inc.. (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Set Aside Default Entry by Sensient Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sensient Technologies, Inc.. (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. O'Neal on behalf of Sensient Technologies, Inc. (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 14 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Sensient Technologies, Inc.(lmb) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #12 Motion for Entry of Default filed by Demarcus Shropshire. Incorrect event selected. Event type and docket text modified to reflect Motion for Default. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 12 MOTION for Default as to Sensient Technology by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A, B and C)(Maag, Thomas) Modified event/docket text on 6/12/2019 (lmb). |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time File Response Instanter by All Plaintiffs. (Maag, Thomas) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex, A, letter of Dec 2017)(Maag, Thomas) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas G. Maag on behalf of Demarcus Shropshire (Maag, Thomas) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. O'Neal on behalf of Sensient Colors LLC (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ACTION - See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney O'Neal does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 6 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Staci M. Yandle and Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. All future documents must bear case number 19-480-SMY-MAB. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (Attachments: #1 Consent Brochure)(kek) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sensient Colors LLC. (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Sensient Colors LLC. Responses due by 6/6/2019 (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sensient Colors LLC. (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Sensient Colors LLC Notice to Plaintiff of Removal (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Saint Clair County, IL, case number 18-l-0474 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3873606), filed by Sensient Colors LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint Exhibit 1 - State Case, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(O'Neal, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.