Frick's Quality Meats, Inc. v. Admiral Parkway, Inc.
| Frick's Quality Meats, Inc. d/b/a Frick's Meat Products Inc. and Frick's Quality Meats, Inc. |
| Admiral Parkway, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00864 |
| August 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Gilbert C Sison |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Admiral Parkway, Inc. and mailed to counsel for Plaintiff for service. (amv) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel and Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison assigned. All future documents must bear case number 19-864-NJR-GCS. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (Attachments: #1 Consent Brochure)(amv) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Frick's Quality Meats, Inc. d/b/a Frick's Meat Products Inc.. (Craney, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James L. Craney on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Craney, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Admiral Parkway, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3948641.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Craney, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
