Eye Physicians of St. Louis, Inc. v. Vision for Life, Ltd.
| EYE PHYSICIANS OF ST. LOUIS, INC. |
| VISION FOR LIFE, LTD., and Vision for Life, Ltd. |
| 3:2019cv00950 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2019 at 3:30 PM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty. Joint Report of the Parties due seven days before the conference. The parties are reminded that the proposed discovery and dispositive motions deadlines must be in compliance with the requirements set forth in this Court's form order. See also SDIL-LR 7.1(f) and Timetable. Instructions for joining the conference call are as follows: Call toll free 877-336-1829; when prompted enter Access Code 4442281; followed by Security Code 8871. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 10/28/2019. (arf)
|
| Filing 14 CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference is set for 10/14/2020 at 9:00 AM with a Bench Trial date of 10/26/2020 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert. (tag) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vision for Life, Ltd.. (Weder, David) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Attorney Bridget G. Hoy. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Bridget G. Hoy $200 fee paid,receipt number 0754-3996388 by on behalf of Vision for Life, Ltd.. (Hoy, Bridget) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Eye Physicians of St. Louis, Inc.. Vision for Life, Ltd. waiver sent on 9/3/2019, answer due 11/4/2019. (Grady, Randall) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Weder on behalf of Vision for Life, Ltd. (Weder, David) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Grady, Randall) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Randall D. Grady on behalf of EYE PHYSICIANS OF ST. LOUIS, INC. (Grady, Randall) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to VISION FOR LIFE, LTD. and original mailed to Attorney Grady. (kek) |
| Filing 5 AO 120 Report of Filing (kek) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ACTION - See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Grady does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. All future documents must bear case number 19-950-JPG-MAB. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (Attachments: #1 Consent Brochure)(kek) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EYE PHYSICIANS OF ST. LOUIS, INC.. (Grady, Randall) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VISION FOR LIFE, LTD., ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3965991.), filed by EYE PHYSICIANS OF ST. LOUIS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration Certificate, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Grady, Randall) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
