Scott v. USA
Plaintiff: Craig Scott
Defendant: The United States of America and USA
Case Number: 3:2019cv01029
Filed: September 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mark A Beatty
Referring Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by USA. Responses due by 12/19/2019 (Biersbach, Nicholas)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's response to Defendant's #7 Motion to Transfer is now due on or before December 5, 2019. (Responses due by 12/5/2019). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/6/2019. (bak)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
November 5, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Transfer Case by Craig Scott. (Brown, Nathaniel)
October 22, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Transfer Case by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - STLC Second Amend Petition, #2 Exhibit B - STCC Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - STLC Petition and Exhibits, #4 Exhibit D - STLC 3-28-2016 First Amended Petition, #5 Exhibit E - STLC First Amended Petition)(Biersbach, Nicholas)
October 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Biersbach on behalf of USA (Biersbach, Nicholas)
October 4, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Scott. USA served on 9/30/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. (Brown, Nathaniel)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to USA. (trb)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel and Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. All future documents must bear case number 19-1029-NJR-MAB. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (Attachments: #1 Consent Brochure)(trb)
September 20, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathaniel O. Brown on behalf of Craig Scott (Brown, Nathaniel)
September 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The United States of America ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3982557.), filed by Craig Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Brown, Nathaniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Scott
Represented By: Nathaniel O. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Nicholas J. Biersbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?