Reynolds v. Werlich
| Michael Curtis Reynolds |
| Warden Werlich |
| 3:2019cv01038 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: This case was opened when Petitioner filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. #1 ) with no case number noted. However, it appears that this is actually a motion intended to be filed in Reynolds v. Terrell,, 19-cv-460-SMY. Petitioner is reminded that filings in existing cases must include the appropriate case number. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file this Motion (Doc. #1 ) in 19-cv-460-SMY and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. No filing fee or strike is assessed for this action. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/21/2019. (bps)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Your case number is 19-1038-NJR. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $5.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge)(jaj)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Curtis Reynolds.(jaj) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Filing fee or Motion for IFP due by 10/24/2019. (jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reynolds v. Werlich | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Curtis Reynolds | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Werlich | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
