SLSB, LLC v. Flatiron Graham Joint Venture
SLSB, LLC d/b/a St. Louis Screw and Bolt and SLSB, LLC |
Flatiron Graham Joint Venture |
3:2019cv01099 |
October 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Gilbert C Sison |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE by Flatiron Graham Joint Venture re #18 Reply to Response to Motion re Filing of #18 Reply (Pacer, Edward) |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. (Pacer, Edward) |
Filing 17 ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case has been selected for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Within 21 days of this Order, any party not previously having filed a Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form in this case must file the attached form indicating that party's consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. The 21-day deadline set forth in this Order does not apply to unserved parties. Deadlines for newly served parties to consent or decline to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge will be set by the Court at a later date. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent due by 12/23/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/2/2019. (kek) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by SLSB, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7)(Albers, Derick) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum in Support by SLSB, LLC. Responses due by 12/12/2019 (Albers, Derick) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Declaration of Ken Tanner corrected to now attach complete exhibits to Notice of Arbitration that were previously inadvertently omitted) by Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. (Scriven-Young, David) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. Responses due by 11/25/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Declaration of Ken Tanner in Support, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Declaration of Tony Clark in Support)(Pacer, Edward) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Derick C. Albers on behalf of SLSB, LLC (Albers, Derick) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary M. Smith on behalf of SLSB, LLC (Smith, Gary) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Joseph Scriven-Young on behalf of Flatiron Graham Joint Venture (Scriven-Young, David) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward Otto Pacer on behalf of Flatiron Graham Joint Venture (Pacer, Edward) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ACTION : In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorneys Smith, Pacer and Scriven-Young do not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Attorney Edward Otto Pacer on 10/9/2019. (cds)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney David Joseph Scriven-Young on behalf of Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 5 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel and Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison assigned. All future documents must bear case number 19-1099-NJR-GCS. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (Attachments: #1 Consent Brochure)(trb) |
Filing fee: $ 200.00, receipt number 34625096509 Pro Have Vice filing Fee received for Attorney, Edward Otto Pacer #4 (cds) |
Filing 4 Amended MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Def Flatiron Graham Joint Venture by Attorney Edward Otto Pacer by on behalf of Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. (Pacer, Edward) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Def Flatiron Graham Joint Venture by Attorney Edward Otto Pacer by on behalf of Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. (Pacer, Edward) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Def Flatiron Graham Joint Venture by Attorney David Joseph Scriven-Young $200 fee paid,receipt number 0754-3996720 by on behalf of All Defendants. (Scriven-Young, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third Judicial Circuit, Madison County, Illinois, case number 2019 MR 001240 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-3996695), filed by Flatiron Graham Joint Venture. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint from State Court, #2 Exhibit B - Notcs of Arb and Defs Counterclaims, #3 Exhibit C - Copies of docs served on Def., #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Scriven-Young, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.