Jackson v. Kennedy et al
| Abre Jackson |
| Aaron J. Campbell |
| 3:2019cv01148 |
| October 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER re #19 Order Selecting Case for Reassignment: The 21-day deadline set forth in the Court's Order does not apply to unserved parties. Deadlines for newly served parties to consent or decline to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge will be set by the Court at a later date. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 12/3/2019. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 20 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case has been selected for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Within 21 days of this Order, any party not previously having filed a Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form in this case must file the attached form indicating that party's consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent due by 12/11/2019.. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 11/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Order)(kdw)
|
| Filing 18 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 17
This Court has received your complaint and initial partial filing fee from the Central District of Illinois, previously assigned case number: 19-1237-CSB. Your new case number is 19-1148-SMY. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. The Court will now review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. A copy of the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form is attached to this Order. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 10/23/2019. (jaj)
|
| Filing 16 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Central; Case Number 1:19-cv-01237. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 15
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/22/2019. Plaintiff has improperly joined his claims against Menard Tactical Team Leader Aaron Campbell with his claims against Pontiac Correctional Center Warden Teri Kennedy. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, the claims involving Defendant Campbell and Menard Correctional are severed and transferred to the Southern District of Illinois for proper venue. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20; 28 U.S.C. Sec 1391(b). Plaintiff's remaining claims against Pontiac Correctional Center are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and as a violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must file a proposed amended complaint concerning his claims against Pontiac Correctional Center within 21 days of this order or on or before November 12, 2019. If Plaintiff fails to file his amended complaint on or before November 12, 2019 or fails to follow the Court's directions, his case may be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renew after Plaintiff clarifies his claims. #5 . Plaintiff's motion for a Hydro- specialist and motion for a status update are both denied. #13 , #14 . The Clerk of the Court is to provide Plaintiff with a blank complaint form and reset the internal merit review deadline in 30 days. See written order. (Attachments: #1 Blank Complaint Form)(KE, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Request Hydro-specialist and Monitor by Plaintiff Abre Jackson. Responses due by 10/22/2019 (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Status of Case by Plaintiff Abre Jackson. Responses due by 10/18/2019 (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/3/2019. Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting a status update and a free copy of his complaint #11 , #12 . The Court has not yet reviewed Plaintiff's complaint. Once the Court reviews Plaintiff's allegations, a merit review order will be entered and the Court will send notice of lawsuit to surviving defendants. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for a status update is granted #11 . However, Plaintiff's motion for a free copy of his complaint is denied since Plaintiff does not have to send a copy of his complaint to the Defendants #12 . (SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION requesting copy of complaint by Plaintiff Abre Jackson. Responses due by 10/16/2019 (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Status of Case by Plaintiff Abre Jackson. Responses due by 9/25/2019 (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Abre Jackson. Plaintiff is now at Illinois River CC. (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 9 Letter from Abre Jackson. (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 8/30/2019. Plaintiff has filed a letter with the Court alleging the Warden is instructing unnamed Pontiac Correctional Center staff members to retaliate against Plaintiff. #8 . Plaintiff complains about frivolous disciplinary tickets, problems making copies of unspecified documents to provide to Defendants, and fear of future bad acts. There are several problems with Plaintiff's filing. First, the Plaintiff must not file letters with the Court. Instead, if Plaintiff is requesting action, he must file a "motion" indicating what action he is requesting. This prevents confusion over the purpose of any filing. Second, the Court has not yet had an opportunity to review the claims in Plaintiff's complaint and enter an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915A. Once the Court enters a merit review order, then the Court will attempt to serve the Defendants. However, the Defendants are not currently in this case and therefore Plaintiff should not send documents to any Defendant. Third, Plaintiff has not articulated a current threat to his safety, and he must first address any concerns about retaliation through the grievance procedure at his institution. (KE, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.]
|
| Filing 8 Letter from Abre Jackson. (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 8/19/2019, in the amount of $20.26; receipt number 14626035075 (JRK, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 7 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Abre Jackson (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Abre Jackson. (VH, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $20.26. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/17/2019. (SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.]
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk of Court to Pontiac CC Trust Fund Dept requesting ledgers 1/11/19 through 7/11/19 (SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria,IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 7/31/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Abre Jackson. Responses due by 7/24/2019 (SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Abre Jackson.(SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aaron J Campbell, Teri Kennedy, filed by Abre Jackson.(SAG, ilcd) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 10/23/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Kennedy et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aaron J. Campbell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Abre Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
