Gleghorn v. Mika Logistics Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Julius Gilbert Gleghorn and Julius Gleghorn
Defendant: Mika Logistics Inc., sergei unknown and Sergei
Case Number: 3:2019cv01295
Filed: November 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mark A Beatty
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case is reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty. District Judge J. Phil Gilbert no longer assigned to the case. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, upon entry into a case, each party must file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. Deadlines for newly served parties to consent or decline to consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction will be set by the Clerk at a later date. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 19-1295-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (dkd)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 16, 2020 Filing 10 First MOTION for Entry of Default by Julius Gleghorn. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Affidavit)(Faron, Michelle)
January 16, 2020 Filing 9 First MOTION for Entry of Default by Julius Gleghorn. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Affidavit)(Faron, Michelle)
January 6, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julius Gleghorn. Sergei served on 12/18/2019, answer due 1/8/2020. (Faron, Michelle)
January 6, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julius Gleghorn. Mika Logistics Inc. served on 12/18/2019, answer due 1/8/2020. (Faron, Michelle)
December 17, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Faron, Michelle)
December 4, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sergei and original mailed to Attorney Faron. (kdw)
November 26, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mika Logistics Inc. Original document sent to attorney for plaintiff for service. (rah)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. All future documents must bear case number 19-1295-JPG-MAB. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (Attachments: #1 Consent Brochure)(rah)
November 25, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle K. Faron on behalf of Julius Gilbert Gleghorn (Faron, Michelle)
November 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mika Logistics Inc.,(Filing fee $400 receipt number 0754-4036874), filed by Julius Gleghorn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue, #3 Summons - Mika Logistics, #4Summons - Sergei)(Faron, Michelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gleghorn v. Mika Logistics Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mika Logistics Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: sergei unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergei
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julius Gilbert Gleghorn
Represented By: Michelle K. Faron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julius Gleghorn
Represented By: Michelle K. Faron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?