Taylor v. Karimi et al
Kennado K. Taylor |
Jane Doe, Erin Hood, Grace B. Hov, Cori Dammermann, Angela Cowell, Terrence Casey, Gegg Scott, Mike Parker, Tori Homan, Illinois Department of Human Services, John Doe, Dennis Schroeker, Karimi and Jen Mudd |
3:2019cv01301 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER finding as moot #15 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff's case was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee (See Docs. 12 and 13). The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of the Order and Judgment (Docs. 12 and 13). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/14/2020. (anp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 15 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kennado K. Taylor. (jaj) |
Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/7/2020. (tjk) |
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/7/2020. (tjk) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying #7 Motion for miscellaneous relief. Plaintiff asks the Court to hear his case because he is not receiving medical care or treatment at Chester Mental Health. Plaintiff has since been transferred from Chester. Thus, to the extent he seeks any type of injunctive relief at Chester that request is now moot as he is no longer housed there. To the extent he is trying to show imminent danger, the Court has already found that his Complaint did not demonstrate imminent danger and the allegations in his motion are new allegations unrelated to the claims set forth in his Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 1/2/2020. (anp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kennado K. Taylor (jaj) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kennado K. Taylor. (jaj) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by Kennado K. Taylor. (jaj) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has until 12/30/2019 to pay the full filing fee or the case will be dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/9/2019. (anp) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case has been selected for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Within 21 days of this Order, any party not previously having filed a Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form in this case must file the attached form indicating that party's consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. The 21-day deadline set forth in this Order does not apply to unserved parties. Deadlines for newly served parties to consent or decline to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge will be set by the Court at a later date. Consent due by 12/23/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Order)(dkd) |
Filing 3 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 19-cv-1301-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. A copy of the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form is attached to this Order. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/26/2019. (jsm2) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kennado K. Taylor. (jsm2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kennado K. Taylor.(jsm2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.