Snowden v. Henning et al
Donald V. Snowden |
Cashier Cindy, Quality Inn Hotel and Jeremy Henning |
3:2019cv01322 |
December 2, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
J Phil Gilbert |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION for status of case and #3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Donald V. Snowden. (jaj) |
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 3.50 received, receipt number 34625098972 (amv) |
![]() |
Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Donald V. Snowden. (jsm2) |
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (jsm2) |
Filing 8 EXHIBIT by Donald V. Snowden. Exhibit to #3 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel. (jsm2) |
Filing 7 Notice of Declination to Consent: A party to this action has declined to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Accordingly, pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case shall REMAIN with District Judge J. Phil Gilbert. (jsm2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jsm2) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Donald V. Snowden. (jsm2) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donald V. Snowden. (jsm2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Donald V. Snowden.(jsm2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.