Howard v. Support Collectors, Inc.
| LaStarr Howard |
| Support Collectors, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00092 |
| January 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CLERK'S JUDGMENT DISMISSING case with prejudice in accordance with the parties' stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/18/2020. (lmt) |
Filing 19
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties jointly filed #16 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice, indicating this case should be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Stipulation for Dismissal is effective immediately upon filing and does not require judicial approval. See e.g., Jenkins v. Village of Maywood, 506 F.3d 622, 624 (7th Cir. 2007). Consequently, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the parties' stipulation (Doc. 16), each party to bear their own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/18/2020. (nmf)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 20-92-RJD. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 17 FINAL CONSENT TO TRIAL BY U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Poncin, Michael) Modified/unsealed on 3/17/2020 (lmb). |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal by LaStarr Howard. (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE: Support Collectors, Inc. was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Support Collectors, Inc. shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 3/20/2020 (lmb) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Support Collectors, Inc. to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Support Collectors, Inc. on 2/20/2020. Consent due by 3/12/2020 (lmb) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Support Collectors, Inc. Support Collectors, Inc. shall file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 3/12/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 2/20/2020. (nmf)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Support Collectors, Inc.. (Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Support Collectors, Inc.. (Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael S Poncin on behalf of Support Collectors, Inc. (Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LaStarr Howard. Support Collectors, Inc. served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020. (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #7 Return of Service Executed filed by LaStarr Howard. Incorrect event used. Select the event which most closely matches the document being filed. For this document, the correct event is "Summons Returned Executed. E-filer is instructed to re-file using Civil>Service of Process> Summons Returned Executed in order to properly trigger the answer due deadline. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 7 STRICKEN RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED by LaStarr Howard on 1/30/2020. (Voytas, Richard) Modified on 2/4/2020 (amv). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #5 Notice (Other) filed by LaStarr Howard. Incorrect event used. Security and docket text updated. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Voytas, Richard) Modified security and docket text on 1/29/2020 (lmb). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Support Collectors, Inc. Original mailed to Attorney Richard A. Voytas, Jr. (lmb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: LaStarr Howard. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-92-RJD. Consent due by 2/13/2020 (lmb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard A. Voytas, Jr on behalf of LaStarr Howard (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Support Collectors, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-4093758.), filed by LaStarr Howard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Voytas, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Howard v. Support Collectors, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Support Collectors, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LaStarr Howard | |
| Represented By: | Richard A. Voytas, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
