Gakuba v. Neese et al
| Peter Gakuba |
| Michelle Neese and Terry Grissom |
| 3:2020cv00213 |
| February 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE - Case transferred from Illinois Southern has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2 as case 1:20-cv-01460, filed 02/28/2020. (kek)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION - Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of Illinois this date. (jaj) |
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, DENYING #2 MOTION for Venue Statement and Declaration filed by Peter Gakuba. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/26/2020. (anp)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE and ORDER The Court has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 20-213-NJR. The following is important information concerning the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined the Court will review your petition to determine whether it survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in an Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you do not receive a preliminary review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel, it will not be considered until the Court has completed the preliminary review of your petition. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). In the event your petition survives the preliminary review, the Court will instruct the respondent to file a response to the petition and you will be notified of your deadline to file a reply. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/24/2020. (amv)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Peter Gakuba. (amv) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay of Habeas, Pending Rule 60b by Peter Gakuba. (amv) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Venue Statement and Declaration by Peter Gakuba. (amv) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Peter Gakuba. (Attachments: #1 Part 1, #2 Part 2)(amv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
