Gordon, Jr. v. Guerrero et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Newton Gordon, Sr.
Defendant: Ramon Guerrero and System Transport, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00289
Filed: March 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mark A Beatty
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 6/24/2020 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty. Joint Report of the Parties due seven days before the conference. The parties are reminded that the proposed discovery and dispositive motions deadlines must be in compliance with the requirements set forth in this Court's form order. See also SDIL-LR 7.1(f) and Timetable. Instructions for joining the conference call are as follows: Call toll free 877-336-1829; when prompted, enter Access Code 4442281; followed by Security Code 0289.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 5/15/2020. (jmj)
May 15, 2020 Filing 13 CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/19/2021 at 10:00 AM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty. Presumptive Jury Trial month set for May 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 5/15/2020.(jmj)
April 28, 2020 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by System Transport, Inc..(Bricker, Lew)
April 28, 2020 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Ramon Guerrero.(Bricker, Lew)
April 17, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 20-289-MAB. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
April 16, 2020 Filing 9 FINAL CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Bricker, Lew) unsealed on 4/17/2020 (trb).
April 14, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garwood, Robert) unsealed on 4/17/2020 (trb).
April 13, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #6 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. It fails to list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction ("et al" is insufficient). Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Another form is attached to this Notice. The form should be re-filed as soon as possible. The form should specifically list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction with the Attorney's signature next to the listed party. Please note that, pursuant to the Courts prior Order, the deadline for submitting this form is 4/16/2020.(tba)
April 10, 2020 Filing 6 STRICKEN CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garwood, Robert) Modified on 4/13/2020 (tba).
April 9, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE: Thomas Newton Gordon Sr., Ramon Guerrero, and System Transport Inc. were directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Thomas Newton Gordon Sr., Ramon Guerrero, and System Transport Inc. shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. The Clerk notes that due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, deadlines that were pending on or before April 1, 2020 were extended in accord with Administrative Order No. 261 and/or Amended Administrative Order No. 261. This automated notice does not take into account any such extensions. If, after the expiration of the 7-day deadline set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Consent due by 4/16/2020 (tba)
March 18, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Thomas Newton Gordon, Jr., Ramon Guerrero, System Transport, Inc.. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-cv-289-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 4/8/2020 (tba)
March 18, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Lew R.C. Bricker on behalf of Ramon Guerrero, System Transport, Inc. (Bricker, Lew)
March 18, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE by Ramon Guerrero, System Transport, Inc. CIVIL COVER SHEET (Bricker, Lew)
March 18, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Williamson County, case number 19 L 178 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-4142682), filed by System Transport, Inc., Ramon Guerrero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A through E)(Bricker, Lew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon, Jr. v. Guerrero et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramon Guerrero
Represented By: Lew R.C. Bricker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: System Transport, Inc.
Represented By: Lew R.C. Bricker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Newton Gordon, Sr.
Represented By: Robert T. Garwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?