Maxton et al v. Novartis Corporation et al
| Lisa Maxton and Jon Maxton |
| Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis AG, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc. and Novartis Corporation |
| 3:2020cv00327 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 Second MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Swartwout, Charles) |
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint)(Murphy, Michael) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Jon Maxton, Lisa Maxton. A motion to dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(6) was filed on April 2, 2020. (See Doc. #3 ). Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint once as a matter of course within 21 days. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Amended Complaint shall be filed instanter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 5/1/2020. (ely)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Murphy on behalf of Jon Maxton, Lisa Maxton (Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF ACTION. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Murphy does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (cds)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. The Clerk notes that due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, deadlines that were pending on or before April 1, 2020 were extended in accord with Administrative Order No. 261 and/or Amended Administrative Order No. 261. This automated notice does not take into account any such extensions. If, after the expiration of the 7-day deadline set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Consent due by 5/4/2020 (cds) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Swartwout, Charles) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint)(Murphy, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent:. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-cv-327-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 4/24/2020 (cds) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Swartwout, Charles) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.(Swartwout, Charles) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Responses due by 5/7/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Swartwout, Charles) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles J. Swartwout on behalf of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Swartwout, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County, Illinois, case number 20-L-0149, filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Swartwout, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
