Central Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. Rollie Excavating & Cement Finishing, Inc.
Central Laborers' Pension Supplement, Southern Illinois Laborers' Annuity Fund, Southern Illinois Laborers' Work Dues, Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Southern Illinois Laborers' Welfare Fund, Southern Illinois Construction Advancement Program (SICAP), Southern Illinois Laborers' Political League (SILPL), Laborers' Local 1197, Laborers' Local 773, Southern and Central Illinois Laborers' Vacation Fund, Southern Illinois Laborers'-Employers Cooperation and Education Trust (LECET) and Illinois Laborers' and Contractor's Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund |
Rollie Excavating & Cement Finishing, Inc. |
3:2020cv00419 |
May 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Mark A Beatty |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rollie Excavating & Cement Finishing, Inc. with original mailed to Attorney Wiggins. (mar) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wiggins, Letitia) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Central Laborers' Pension Supplement, Illinois Laborers' and Contractor's Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund, Laborers' Local 1197, Laborers' Local 773, Southern Illinois Construction Advancement Program (SICAP), Southern Illinois Laborers' Annuity Fund, Southern Illinois Laborers' Political League (SILPL), Southern Illinois Laborers' Welfare Fund, Southern Illinois Laborers' Work Dues, Southern Illinois Laborers'-Employers Cooperation and Education Trust (LECET), Southern and Central Illinois Laborers' Vacation Fund. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-419-MAB. Consent due by 5/28/2020 (trb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Letitia B. Wiggins on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wiggins, Letitia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-4174643.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Wiggins, Letitia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.