Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
| Trent Warren |
| Deana Brookheart, Illinois Department of Corrections, Baldwin, Wexford Medical Corporation, Felix Rodrigez, Jane Doe 1-5 and Jeff Dennison |
| 3:2020cv00532 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Jeff Dennison to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Jeff Dennison on 7/29/2020. Consent due by 8/19/2020 (lmb)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley M. Walker on behalf of Jeff Dennison (Walker, Ashley)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying #11 Motion for Leave to File; denying #12 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/28/2020. (anp)
|
|
Filing 13
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Jeff Dennison waiver sent on 7/15/2020, answer due 9/14/2020. (tjk)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Trent Warren. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Trent Warren. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 10
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Jeff Dennison on 7/15/2020. Waiver of Service due by 8/14/2020. (jaj)
|
|
Filing 9
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Dr. Felix Rodrigez on 7/15/2020. Waiver of Service due by 8/14/2020. (jaj)
|
|
Filing 8
Order for Service of Process upon Dr. Felix Rodrigez and Jeff Dennison (official capacity only). Jeff Dennison (official capacity only) is ADDED to the case for purposes of identifying Jane Doe Nurse #1 and implementing any injunctive relief. Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Medical Corporation, Baldwin (Director, IDOC), Deana Brookheart (Warden, Lawrence CC), and Jane Doe #'s 2-5 are DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 7/14/2020. (anp)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly for further proceedings. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 20-532-RJD. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 2.13 received, receipt number 34625102400 (amv)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #2 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $2.13. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid.In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Pinckneyville Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/15/2020. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 06/05/2020. Consent due by 6/26/2020.(jsm2)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 20-cv-532-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/5/2020. (jsm2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trent Warren. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Trent Warren.(jsm2)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
