Moon v. Meade et al
| Darnell W Moon |
| D. Sproul, Katherine Siereveld, J LeClair, B. Meade, D. Christensen, T. Castellano and Mr. Price |
| 3:2020cv00648 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Stay Proceedings/Case by Darnell W Moon. (jaj) |
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response by Darnell W Moon. Defendants filed a Notice of Removal in this matter on July 1, 2020. Plaintiff was ordered to file a response, if at all, by August 4, 2020. However, he was unable to do so due to a COVID-19 lockdown at USP-Marion. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a response to Defendants' Notice of Removal on or before SEPTEMBER 8, 2020. He is again WARNED that failure to do so may result in dismissal of this suit for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/6/2020. (jsy) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Removal Petition by Darnell W Moon. (amv) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jsm2) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. The Clerk notes that due to the COVID-19 public health crisis, deadlines that were pending on or before April 1, 2020 were extended in accord with Administrative Order No. 261 and/or Amended Administrative Order No. 261. This automated notice does not take into account any such extensions. If, after the expiration of the 7-day deadline set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Consent due by 7/31/2020. (jsm2) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Action due by 8/4/2020. (jsm2) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Defendants filed a Notice of Removal in this matter on July 1, 2020. Plaintiff shall file a response, if at all, on or before August 4, 2020. He is WARNED that failure to do so may result in dismissal of this suit for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/21/2020. (jsy)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Party by All Defendants. (Jones, Laura) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re 4 Order. Defendants removed the case on 7/1/2020. Docket text updated to reflect correct date. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER: Defendants removed this action from state court on 7/1/2020. The case has been assigned to Judge J. Phil Gilbert and all pleadings shall bear the case number 20-648-JPG. The Complaint appears to be a civil action, filed by a prisoner (as defined by the Prison Litigation Reform Act), seeking redress from a governmental entity and/or officer or employee of a governmental entity. Such actions are subject to a preliminary merits review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. Martin v. United States, 96 F.3d 853, 854 (7th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, if the Court finds that removal is proper, the Court will proceed with reviewing the Complaint pursuant to Section 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform the parties of the findings in a Merit Review Order. If the parties do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, a motion for status may be filed. If the Petition survives the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided at that time. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, Plaintiff is advised that if his address changes, he must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/2/2020. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 7/2/2020. Consent due by 7/23/2020 (jaj) |
| Judge J. Phil Gilbert added. (jaj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura J. Jones on behalf of All Defendants (Jones, Laura) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Williamson County, case number 2020-L-60, filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Pleading, #2 Exhibit Certification, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
