Monk v. Transunion Credit Report et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Monk
Defendant: Equifax Credit Report, Experian Credit Report and Transunion Credit Report
Case Number: 3:2020cv00789
Filed: August 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Referring Judge: Gilbert C Sison
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2020 Filing 13 USCA Case Number 20-2828 for #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Kevin Monk. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Case Opening, #2 Fee Notice)(ack)
September 22, 2020 Filing 12 Rule 10 Letter (ack)
September 21, 2020 Filing 11 Transmission of Short Record to US Court of Appeals re #10 Notice of Appeal (ack)
September 21, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Clerk's Judgment by Kevin Monk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Receipts, #3 Envelope)(ack)
August 27, 2020 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/27/2020. (dhg)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying #3 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel ; denying #4 Motion for Service of Process at Government Expense; denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Because Plaintiff has alleged no facts stating a plausible claim for relief, his Motions are DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(3)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly.. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/27/2020. (dhg)
August 19, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: This case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 20-789-NJR. (ack)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
August 17, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Monk. (cds)
August 17, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Monk. (cds)
August 17, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Kevin Monk. (cds)
August 17, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Kevin Monk. (cds)
August 17, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kevin Monk.(cds) (1) Civil Cover Sheet (cds). Modified on 8/17/2020 (cds).
August 17, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent:. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-789-GCS. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 9/8/2020 (cds) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/17/2020: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (cds).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monk v. Transunion Credit Report et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Monk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Credit Report
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Credit Report
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transunion Credit Report
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?