Knox v. Acuff et al
Robert Guadian, Damon Acuff, Matthew T. Albence and Chad Wolf |
Prince Solomon Knox |
3:2020cv00822 |
August 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Prince Solomon Knox against Chad Wolf, Damon Acuff, Matthew T. Albence, Robert Guadian. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/5/2020. (beb) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING IMMEDIATE RELEASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) is GRANTED. Respondents are ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner Prince Solomon Knox, pursuant to the conditions set forth in the Order. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/5/2020. (beb) |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #18 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Prince Solomon Knox. Docket text modified to reflect the filed document is a reply to response filed at Doc 10 and not a reply to response to motion filed at doc 15. (rah)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Prince Solomon Knox. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Petitioner's Supplemental Declaration)(Zwick, Keren) Modified on 10/1/2020 (rah). |
Filing 17 Sealed Document (Southern Seven Records) by All Defendants. (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Respondents' motion for leave to supplement response by filing records under seal. The proposed supplement consists of a health department report on the Pulaski Detention Center that includes interviews of detainees and information on their medical issues. Filing the document(s) under seal is therefore appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/22/2020. (beb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 15 MOTION to Seal Document (Motion to Supplement Response by Filing Documents Under Seal) by All Defendants. (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 14 ORDER: Petitioner is granted leave to file a Reply to the Response (Doc. #10 ), on or before September 30, 2020. The Reply brief shall not exceed 5 pages. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/17/2020. (beb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 13 Sealed Document Exhibit B to Response (Medical Records_088-144) by All Defendants. (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 12 Sealed Document Exhibit B to Response (Medical Records_043-087) by All Defendants. (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 11 Sealed Document Exhibit B to Response (Medical Records_001-042) by All Defendants. (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 Sealed Document Response to Petition & Complaint for Injunctive Relief by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (DDO Gritte Declaration), #2 Exhibit C (Warden Acuff Declaration), #3 Exhibit D (OSUP Form))(Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Respondents' motion for leave to file Petitioner's medical records under seal. The documents contain personal information about Petitioner's medical conditions which should not be publicly accessible. Furthermore, if the Response and/or additional exhibits contain Petitioner's personal medical information (beyond merely referencing the sealed medical records), Respondents may also file those documents under seal. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/14/2020. (beb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 8 MOTION to Seal - Petitioner's Medical Records that Respondents Plan to Reference in the Response by All Defendants. (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Biersbach on behalf of Damon Acuff, Matthew T. Albence, Robert Guadian, Chad Wolf (Biersbach, Nicholas) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed on Habeas Corpus Acknowledgement Letter by Prince Solomon Knox. (Zwick, Keren) |
Filing 5 ORDER Amending the Order for Service of Process at Doc. #4 . Page 3 of the Order is amended as follows: the Clerk of Court shall not effect service on the Respondents. Instead, Petitioner's Counsel shall be responsible for service on all Respondents and shall do so forthwith. Respondents shall answer the Petition or otherwise plead on or before September 16, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/26/2020. (beb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 4 Order for Service of Process upon Acuff, Guadian, Albence, and Wolf. Respondents shall answer the Petition or otherwise plead on or before September 16, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/26/2020. (beb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Keren Hart Zwick on behalf of Prince Solomon Knox (Zwick, Keren) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 20-822-NJR. (jsm2) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0754-4262944.), filed by Prince Solomon Knox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Petitioner, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Expert, #3 Exhibit US v. Knox, #4 Exhibit Knox v. Holder, #5 Exhibit May 2020 Release Request, #6 Exhibit ICE Correspondence, #7 Exhibit Medical Records, #8 Exhibit Letter of Support, #9 Exhibit Acuff Declaration, #10 Exhibit IDPH Report)(Zwick, Keren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.