Holman v. CBE Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Martin A. Holman
Defendant: CBE Group, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00831
Filed: August 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: J Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2020 Filing 14 CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for 10/20/2021 at 9:00 AM with a Jury Trial date of 11/1/2021 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert. Parties are to submit a Joint Report regarding Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order within 21 days of the entry of this filing. Scheduling/Discovery and Settlement Conferences will NOT be set for hearing unless requested by the parties or deemed necessary by the Court. (tag)
October 1, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge J. Phil Gilbert for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 20-831-JPG. (trb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 30, 2020 Filing 12 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Watts, Patrick)
September 30, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing CBE Group, Inc. to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to CBE Group, Inc. on 9/30/20. Consent due by 10/21/2020 (trb)
September 29, 2020 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CBE Group, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent CBE Companies, Inc. for CBE Group, Inc.. (Watts, Patrick)
September 29, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by CBE Group, Inc..(Watts, Patrick)
September 29, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick A Watts on behalf of CBE Group, Inc. (Watts, Patrick)
September 18, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Taylor, Alexander)
September 11, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Martin A. Holman. CBE Group, Inc. served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020. (Daher, Marwan)
August 28, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CBE Group, Inc. and returned to attorney Marwan R. Daher for service. (trb)
August 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Martin A. Holman. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-831-MAB. Consent due by 9/18/2020 (trb)
August 27, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander J. Taylor on behalf of Martin A. Holman (Taylor, Alexander)
August 27, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Marwan R. Daher on behalf of Martin A. Holman (Daher, Marwan)
August 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CBE Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-4266851.), filed by Martin A. Holman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Daher, Marwan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holman v. CBE Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CBE Group, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick A Watts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin A. Holman
Represented By: Marwan R. Daher
Represented By: Alexander J. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?