Ruckman v. Protective Insurance Company
| Kenneth Ruckman |
| Protective Insurance Company |
| 3:2020cv00922 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Protective Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 22
ORDER DENYING #12 Motion to Strike. This matter has been stayed (Doc. 19). Accordingly, the motion to strike is DENIED without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate, after the stay has been lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 10/15/2020. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Rodney D. Fourez, II terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 10/14/2020. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Protective Insurance Company. (Fourez, Rodney) |
| Status Report due by 11/13/2020, per Order at Doc. 19. (kls3) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #15 Joint Motion to Stay the Proceedings. Plaintiff and Defendant jointly request the Court to stay all proceedings in this matter as the parties go through the arbitration process to potentially resolve this matter. Accordingly, the joint motion is GRANTED. The parties are instructed to file a status report on or before November 13, 2020 detailing the updated arbitration timeline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 10/8/2020. (spl)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 20-922-MAB. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 17 FINAL CONSENT TO TRIAL BY U.S. MAGISTRATE. (Fritz, Kevin) Modified/unsealed on 10/7/2020 (lmb). |
| Filing 16 NOTICE REGARDING FILING re #15 Motion to Stay filed by Protective Insurance Company. The pleading contains multiple /s/signatures without the statement that the non filing attorney consents to the document. This Notice is sent for informational purposes only. (cds)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Consent by Protective Insurance Company. (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Becker, Nathan) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES re #11 by Kenneth Ruckman. (Becker, Nathan) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Strike by Protective Insurance Company. (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to Complaint by Protective Insurance Company.(Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Protective Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal Notice to State Court of Notice of Removal (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan A. Becker on behalf of Kenneth Ruckman (Becker, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ACTION. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Becker does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (lmb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Protective Insurance Company, Kenneth Ruckman. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 20-922-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 10/5/2020 (lmb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rodney D. Fourez, II on behalf of Protective Insurance Company (Fourez, Rodney) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Protective Insurance Company. (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Protective Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Protective Insurance Corporation for Protective Insurance Company. (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin L. Fritz on behalf of Protective Insurance Company (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Protective Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal Notice to Plaintiff (Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County, case number 2020L001161 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0754-4278427), filed by Protective Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fritz, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruckman v. Protective Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Protective Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Rodney D. Fourez, II |
| Represented By: | Kevin L. Fritz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Ruckman | |
| Represented By: | Nathan A. Becker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
