Oliver v. Bloodworth
Plaintiff: King Michael Oliver
Defendant: Ralph L. Bloodworth, II
Case Number: 3:2020cv00925
Filed: September 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Stephen P McGlynn
Referring Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE by King Michael Oliver (amv)
October 21, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Alter or Amend #5 Clerk's Judgment by King Michael Oliver. (amv)
October 6, 2020 Filing 6 Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 277, this case is transferred from Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel and reassigned to Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. Unless the newly assigned judge directs otherwise, all deadlines and hearing dates shall remain in effect. All future pleadings shall bear the case number 20-925-SPM. (lmb)
September 21, 2020 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Ralph L. Bloodworth, II against King Michael Oliver. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/21/2020. (tjk)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Petitioner Oliver did not pay the $5.00 filing fee for this case when he submitted the Petition, nor did he file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and thus, Oliver still owes the filing fee for this action. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/21/2020. (jrj)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Motion for Federal Stay and a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 20-925-NJR. The following is important information concerning the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined the Court will review your petition to determine whether it survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in an Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you do not receive a preliminary review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel, it will not be considered until the Court has completed the preliminary review of your petition. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). In the event your petition survives the preliminary review, the Court will instruct the respondent to file a response to the petition and you will be notified of your deadline to file a reply. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/14/2020. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 11, 2020 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by King Michael Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support)(jaj)
September 11, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Federal Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2251 filed by King Michael Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibits part 1, #3 Exhibits part 2, #4 Exhibits part 3, #5 Exhibits part 4, #6 Exhibits part 5, #7 Exhibits part 6, #8 Exhibits part 7, #9 Exhibits part 8, #10 Exhibits part 9)(jaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliver v. Bloodworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: King Michael Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph L. Bloodworth, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?