Smith v. Jeffreys et al
| Jared M. Smith |
| Terry Grissom, Connie Houston, Penny George, Dave White, Sarah Robertson, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Rob Jeffreys, Lt. Ramage, Greta Smith, Kimberly Birch, Matthew Swalls and Ultra Sound Technicians |
| 3:2020cv00949 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/9/2020. (anp) |
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, GRANTING #8 MOTION to Withdraw filed by Jared M. Smith. This entire action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/9/2020. (anp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw Complaint by Jared M. Smith. (jaj) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has until 12/2/2020 to pay the full filing fee or his case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/4/2020. (anp)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Jared M. Smith. Document filed as a Trust Fund Statement when it was a Motion to Proceed IFP. Entry stricken and re-filed with correct title. No further action required. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jared M. Smith. (jaj) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY STRICKEN - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jared M. Smith. (jaj) Modified on 9/28/2020 (jaj). |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Complaint. Your case number is 20-949-NJR. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, you are ORDERED to submit the $400.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If you file a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, the Court must review your trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Thus, you must have the Trust Fund Officer at your facility complete the attached certification and provide a copy of your trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent). If you fail to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/17/2020. (jaj)
|
| Filing 2 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jared M. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
