Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Phillip S. Thomas |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSAOGC |
3:2020cv00993 |
September 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Mark A Beatty |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Beyer Payne on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Payne, Lindsay) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF REFERRAL: Upon consent of parties case transferred to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty for final disposition. Judge J. Phil Gilbert no longer assigned to the case. (kls3) |
Filing 12 FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garrison, Suzanne) Modified as FINAL and unsealed on 11/19/2020 (kls3). |
Filing 11 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #10 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge, #9 Notice of Appearance filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Documents attached filed in wrong case. (kls3)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 10 STRICKEN. CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Garrison, Suzanne) Modified on 11/18/2020 (kls3). Unsealed on 11/19/2020 (kls3). |
Filing 9 STRICKEN. NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne M. Garrison on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Garrison, Suzanne) Modified on 11/18/2020 (kls3). |
Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Sutterfield, David) Unsealed on 11/19/2020 (kls3). |
Filing 7 NOTICE: In a continued effort to equalize the distribution of cases in this judicial district (see Administrative Order No. 277), effective immediately, this case will no longer be referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings. Should the parties elect to consent to have the Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this matter, the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form shall be filed before the filing of Defendants brief. Consents filed after this deadline may not be accepted by the District Judge. Magistrate Judge Beatty no longer assigned to case. All future documents must bear case number 20-993-JPG. (mar)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, and returned to Attorney Sutterfield for service. (kls3) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Phillip S. Thomas. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/30/2020. (jdh) |
Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert and Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:20-cv-993-JPG-MAB. If the parties consent to Magistrate Judge assignment, the consent form with instruction is attached for your convenience. (kls3) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Sutterfield on behalf of Phillip S. Thomas (Sutterfield, David) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Phillip S. Thomas. (Sutterfield, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Phillip S. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interest, #3 Summons, #4 USM-285 forms)(Sutterfield, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.